XXX heeft geschreven: > The nefarious top-poster YYY wrote: >> On or about 5/27/2002 ..., ZZZ allegedly wrote: >>> YYY wrote: >>>> On or about 5/27/2002 ..., AAA allegedly wrote: >>>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, YYY wrote: >>>>>> Because I'm a control freaq and it just bugs me. No reasonable
I can understand that developers get a bit weary of some threads in this Mozilla group. Paul Berendsen (nefarios sub-top-poster). Christopher Jahn heeft geschreven: > The nefarious top-poster Steve Smith wrote: > >> On or about 5/27/2002 18:47, having not taken the 5th, Bob Dietz >> allegedly wrote: >> >>> Steve Smith wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On or about 5/27/2002 15:16, having not taken the 5th, michael lefevre >>>> allegedly wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve Smith wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Because I'm a control freaq and it just bugs me. No reasonable >>>>>> reason, just personal quirks. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> in which case, i'm afraid the exact answer to your original >>>>> question is >>>>> "no, there isn't a pref for setting a different From: address" >>>>> >>>> > >>> My reasons are not relevant; and you should not be making > >>> judgments. I am not a spammer and don't care to be considered >>> one. > >>> >>> He asked you, why you wished to avoid having a dummy account. >>> (Perhaps he thought he might be able to help with a work around >>> or a different slant if he knew why.) >>> >>> You said, 'no reason.' >>> >>> He replied, no. No solution to the problem as stated. >>> >>> Where do you get that he is making judgments or calling >>> you a spammer??? >>> >>> Bob Dietz >>> >> >> You'll have to back up to my first message to see the context. I >> pretty much generally find it offense to ask "How?", and then, before >> someone will answer the question, they want to answer "How?" with >> "Why?". In doing that they are judging, not responding. I have gotten >> that previous employers on occassion, usually those that don't >> understand that not only is /their/ time money, but mine is as well. >> That's not a consideration here, but it should help place my >> irritation in context. >> > > > First of all, I was the one who asked "why", and not anyone else. > Bob is attributing two statements to one person, which is confusing the > issue. > > When I asked "why?", I was attempting to get an accurate depiction of > the problem; making dummy accounts is an easy and obvious solution, and > I was trying to see if there is some reason to avoid this solution that > I was not aware of. > > YOur initial response to this question was "No reason". > > Michael then responded that there was no adjustment, to which you > suddenly go off on a childish tantrum about judgement and spamming that > makes no sense given that all he did was answer your question. > > Instead of throwing childish and unprovoked tantrums, you should read > Steve GEver's post, in which he discusses the users_prefs you need to > change. > > And while asking "why" may or may not be rationally considered > judgemental, Michael didn't deserve the response you gave, and you owe > him an apology. > > >
