Doh... I'm sleeping. Better go back to bed. :-)
Sorry for that lame reply. No use in IMAP. And no, I don't know IMAP in 
it's full extend, but if I where just a little bit awake I would know 
more than I apparently do now. :D

On 24-09-2002 07:55, Steve Sobel wrote:
> Uh..
> 
> do you know what IMAP is?
> 
> manXxon wrote:
> 
>> Not that I'm quite sure what the real problem is, bu are you sure you 
>> haven't somehow checked the leave messages on server in mail & 
>> newsgroup s account settings? If so, your problem makes perfectly sence.
>>
>> /manXxon
>>
>> On 23-09-2002 22:43, Steve Sobel wrote:
>>
>>> I have a problem with IMAP, and it seems to only be on some servers.
>>>
>>> The whole point of IMAP is to be able to check the same account from 
>>> multiple locations.  So please, don't bother replying if you're going 
>>> to tell me that the setup I have is unnecessary, or should be done a 
>>> different way.  It works fine in Outlook, much as I'm not a fan of 
>>> Outlook.
>>>
>>> Anyhow, the situation:
>>>
>>> I have mozilla running at home, and at work, checking the same two 
>>> email accounts - both running on different email servers.
>>>
>>> On email accounts A and B, the following behavior occurs (A being the 
>>> correct behavior):
>>>
>>> account A) I get home from work, having read all of the messages that 
>>> came to me that day, and I look at my mozilla mail at home - and all 
>>> the messages are marked read.  I have 0 new messages (unless I got 
>>> one while I was driving home, anyhow).
>>>
>>> account B) Messages I have read and even deleted still appear in my 
>>> inbox and marked as new.  If I close mozilla and reopen it - the 
>>> number of new messages is still reported incorrectly - however, after 
>>> having closed/reopened it - if I click on that inbox, it refreshes 
>>> with the proper number of unread/new messages (usually zero).
>>>
>>> Now, I understand that because of the fact that it works on one email 
>>> server and doesn't on another - it may be that server B does not 
>>> follow some RFC perfectly or something.  However, outlook handles 
>>> this discrepancy fine.
>>>
>>> That server (server B) - for your testing pleasure - is Merak Mail 
>>> Server, by Icewarp Software - www.icewarp.com ...
>>>
>>> Anyone know if this is the kind of thing that may get looked into?  
>>> Or will Mozilla folks go "tell them to follow the damn RFC, screw off"?
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>
> 


Reply via email to