Doug Turner wrote:
> Mike Shaver wrote:
>>What sort of UI does protozilla require, and how does it meaningfully
>>differ from the other protocols' UI requirements? (I confess to never
>>having used Protozilla. Bad me.)
>
> Core protocols require very little use to be useful. Protozilla requires UI to just
>to be useful.
>
> http://protozilla.mozdev.org/screenshots.html
Those look like configuration screens, much like our protocol pref
windows (send-email-as-FTP-password, etc.). svn: is it possible to use
protozilla protocols without any having to bring up those windows,
assuming that you have the proper configuration entries in ?
(Why is the presence of a UI requirement -- above and beyond nsIPrompt,
of course, which most of our protocols use -- a barrier to entry into
the hallowed netwerk/protocol/ tree? I'm not unhappy with it being an
extension, I'm just not clear on what the criteria are.)
Mike
