On Sun, 3 Jun 3901 00:36:12, Duane Chamblee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Kaply wrote:
> >
> > The basic problem here is the number of DLLs that Mozilla uses. On OS/2,
> > loading DLLs is expensive.
> >
> > Mozilla is creating a version that uses fewer DLLs, and once this is done,
> > startup should get better.
>
> I'd really like to see some of the gecko/rendering stuff be
> integrated/availble in the WPS, then many of these DLLs would already be
> loaded (sound's like IE heh)
Yeah, I've thought to myself as well that it'd be great to see current
JPEG and PNG support available for the WPS.
On the top of preloading though, I believe as of version 0.9 of
Mozilla on the Win32 platform you can select an option to allow Moz to
load a lot of its DLLs at boot-up, to give it a load-time that appear
much more like IE. Though it has one important difference. The user
can *decide* if he/she wants it or not!
Jeff
----------------
Whatza JamochaMUD? http://jamochamud.anecho.mb.ca
Or other stuff: http://www.anecho.mb.ca/~jeffnik
