Yes i can confirm it, i feel it has do due with drawing picture engine.
Best result can be seen at this page :
http://www.mcarey.com/
loading time on 0.6 is around 20-30 sec on 4.61 10-15 sec on 0.9.2 around 1 Min up to
1,5 mins
Looks like if bigger the image the more the 0.9.2 needs time for displaying them .
I would like to see a 0.9.x version with the grapic engine of the 0.6
as long as this 2 engines doesnt have same speed on drawing.
(Even Staroffice loads this page faster as 0.9.2 lol)
Reinhard
Achim Hasenmueller schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I found the optimized 0.6 build that Mike posted last week to be
> much faster than the 0.9.2 release that is also optimized.
>
> The difference is not small - at least 100% - 150% here. I am
> currently trying to find out why. Performance should be much
> better in 0.9.2 but I observe the opposite here.
>
> I saw speed differences while
>
> - opening a new window (Ctrl-N)
> - loading a page
> - scrolling in a page
> - opening dialogs (preferences)
> - moving other windows over Warpzilla (repaint)
> - ...
>
> Can anyone confirm this? Note, don't try with OS2WEB or the
> original 0.6 - take the opt one from
>
>
>ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozilla0.6/mozilla-i386-pcos2-vacpp-opt-0.6.zip
>
> Best regards,
> Achim
