On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:37:45 -0600, Michael Kaply wrote: >Not sure what to do about this. Mozilla (and Windows for that matter) >has a concept of "busy but you can use the browser" OS/2 does not. >We added this pointer for this purpose. >Using the wait cursor would be incorrect in this case because you can >still do stuff, and using the regular cursor would be incorrect in this >case because it gives no indication of what's happening. >We're open to suggestions.
My suggestion would be to use the normal pointer anyway. Windoze uses the pointer&wait combination because of its bad multithreading. OS/2 users don't really care if the browser is doing things in the background. -- (To email me, replace the .com with .gr) � H.I.C. & D.B.S. � OS/2 Warp � Hellas � � ServerConfig � ConfigEdit � OS/2 UK UG � � Live fast, die young, and leave a handsome corpse. �
