On Mon, 07 Jan 2002 07:07:09 -0600 Michael Kaply <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I provided templates with prefilled in fields where all you had to type > was a subject and description and people still didn't use them.
That's the kind of thing I was thinking about. Maybe because I have a HATE! HATE! HATE! relationship with Bugzilla, I don't recall hearing about or seeing your prefilled templates. Here's hoping that whatever you decide to provide will this time be better publicised to potential users. mikus p.s. I visit the Mozilla website as little as possible, because it is set up for communication among developers of Mozilla, __not__ for users of Mozilla. [Example - the *only* place I have found any sort of documentation of Mozilla_Invocation_Parameters is in the description of one test case. (And even then - that test case mentions the parameter '-ProfileManager', yet I believe somebody reported that '-ProfileManager' had been ignored by Mozilla/2.)] [Another example - I looked at the documentation being kept for a particular closed bug. It consisted of an interchange of emails between two developers, talking about source submission minutiae instead of about the bug. Their documented comments could not have been more incomprehensible to me if they were speaking in Urdu.]
