James Jones wrote: > 2. IBM has yet to bother to provide updated versions of the LVM > and TCP/IP Java-based interfaces, and hence one has to keep > around both versions of Java (and because of that IBM recommends > that the newer Java _not_ be made the default; I made that mistake > on the computer I moved to my current one from).
I don't know about LVM, but the TCP/IP 4.3 revision IBM released a couple of days ago says it has Java 1.3 support. Graham. -- *-* Please remove spam free prefix before replying *-*
