Hi, Some customers (usually big ones) will only adopt a software product if there is a company backing and supporting it. Some development companies feel they should provide certain products with their name on them. These are the main reasons that there are IBM and Netscape versions of Mozilla The Mozilla project was designed to allow for these branded versions of Mozilla and there is nothing wrong with them. They are just outdated when compared to the current active development of the main Mozilla code.
Regards, On Tue, 05 Mar 2002 00:59:02 +0100, Christoph Vogelbusch wrote: >Hi, > >I wondered why there is a IBM Web Browser instead of a Netscape for OS/2. >Is that because of all the Windows-Only-Software included? [...] >So why the effor to make a product that not even as good?
