Martin Schaff�ner wrote: >On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 23:59:02, Christoph Vogelbusch ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>May be with a bundling of Odin (if nesseccary) this would be teh better >>solution. >> > >Because Odin does not work well enough? I think that IBM has done a >great job porting mozilla to OS/2. Yes, they are having trouble with >certain things (like the select() thingie), but what happened if Odin >was used? We would just add another bug layer. As it is it is already >difficult enough to find the cause of certain bugs, but with odin, we >would have to specify, if the bug is in mozilla, in odin, or the os. >Not an idea I like. > >BTW, I don't like the look of windows programs on my os/2 desktop. If >I want windows look, I will switch to it. Not that I don't use Odin, >but if I have the choice, I will stick with the OS/2 interface. > You got me wrong I don't want Netscape to use ODIN. I want the additional components to be still included like realplayer 8 or AIM. They are running well with Odin and have never been ported, but it'S hybrid then
Ciao/2 Chtistoph
