On Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:01:54 -0500 (EST) "dinkmeister" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 0.9.9 build doesn't deserve a version number ;)
>
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:48:54 +0000 (GMT), Dimitris 'sehh' Michelinakis wrote:
> :0.9.9 is awful! more crashes, ftp download dialog shows wrong numbers, etc.


What's with all this 0.9.9 nay-saying ?

I use Mozilla as a browser (not as mail, not as IRC, not as HTML
creator, not ...).  So far, I have __not__ encountered __any__
new situation where Mozilla 0.9.9 has prevented me from browsing.
[No crashes since the 0.9.9 release (2002031114).]

I am of the opinion that some Mozilla 0.9.9 failures can be avoided
by the user.  For instance, when I don't like the download dialog
showing wrong numbers, then I press <shift> as I click on the link.


mikus


p.s.  I finally got it !!

      I was coming from the latest 0.9.8 daily, and things did not
      go worse for me with 0.9.9.

      The users who complain are coming from an earlier *release*,
      and have not been gradually conditioned to accept quirks that
      first appeared in dailies.

      Well, lots of people (from other platforms as well as OS/2)
      have made changes to Mozilla since the time of those releases.
      The users who are suddenly faced with 0.9.9 need to decide
      which is more important to them --
          "ok" things 0.9.9 does that the earlier release didn't
      or "bad" things 0.9.9 does that the earlier release didn't


Reply via email to