We're working on the XPINSTALL stuff which will allow you to install pieces.
Duane Chamblee wrote: > I think that is doable, but there ARE reasons to supply the eMail, > newsgroup, HTML editor (getting REALLY NICE), and chat clients... > > What I would like to see is the seperation of the OS/2 mozilla builds > into components... > > Gecko library (base, other apps can use this) > User Profile interface > WebBrowser (allows communication and file transfer) > Composer > Messaging > chat > > Everything is "stacked" on seperate libraries. > Oh but I wish I could get back into the code smithing, but I've never > taken the time to get an dev. environment configured. > > Frank Berke wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mikus Grinbergs) schrieb am Thu, 14 Mar 2002 22:15:03 > > UTC: > > > > > >>I use Mozilla as a browser (not as mail, not as IRC, not as HTML > >>creator, not ...). So far, I have __not__ encountered __any__ > >>new situation where Mozilla 0.9.9 has prevented me from browsing. > >>[No crashes since the 0.9.9 release (2002031114).] > > > > Same here. I don't use Mozilla's extra featues and would appreciate > > any attempt in turning the beast into a browser-only application. So > > far I've not the faintest reason to complain about the 0.9.9 build... > > it's just the best browser I've ever seen in OS/2! > > > > > >>I am of the opinion that some Mozilla 0.9.9 failures can be avoided > >>by the user. For instance, when I don't like the download dialog > >>showing wrong numbers, then I press <shift> as I click on the link. > > > > Or use a decent download manager, such as WGet, best in conjunction > > with AutoWGet. > > > >
