Michael Kaply wrote: > Felix Miata wrote: > > Are these two the same thing as each other or above?: > No > > ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-1.0/mozilla-os2.zip 16035 KB >02/06/03 00:58:00 > This is the latest build of Mozilla 1.0 (it is most likely the release) > > ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-1.0.0/mozilla-os2.zip 16279 Kb >Sun Jun 2 21:58:00 2002 > This is the latest build of the Mozilla 1.0 branch (beyond 1.0 - towards 1.0.1)
I'm not sure I'm any less confused now. It looks like there have been *four* public Mozilla OS/2 releases in the past 24 hours, after there being none on Saturday: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-1.0.0/mozilla-os2.zip 2 21:58 16279 Kb ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-trunk/mozilla-os2.zip Jun 2 13:56 16397 Kb ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-1.0/mozilla-os2.zip Jun 3 00:58 16034 Kb http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-1.0/mozilla-os2.zip Jun 3 00:58 15.7M Normally I've been running trunk builds downloaded from ftp://ftp... Which of these would you like me to replace Friday's trunk build with, or should I just stay on the trunk and wait an hour for the next build due? I'm not sure I'd like the branches after getting used to some good fixes that missed the 1.0 cut. Tab close order reversal is super. So is mailnews options to cut the noise level in HTML posts. But if it will help you more, I'll do the one you suggest. -- "It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible." George Washington Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.members.atlantic.net/
