Frodo Baggins wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 18:42:11 UTC, "William L. Hartzell" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > >>One would not use Mozilla for a production deployment, but instead a >>production enabled version like IBM WebBrowser, or Netscape 7.0. > > [...] > > Why? From my experience, Mozilla support has been more reliable than > IWB or Netscape support. >
The question is not about reliability, but about support for deployment. Mozilla does not come with tool to assist deploying to hundreds of desktop. IBM WebBrowser does as does the new Netscape 7.0 for Windows. Later this year IBM will release a version of IBM Web Broswer based upon the current Mozilla 1.0 release since Netscape has released Netscape 7.0 based upon it. Have you not noticed that IBM releases new versions of its browser whenvever Netscape releases a new version of Netscape, based upon the same code that Netscape uses? -- Bill <American Independence's Day is the Fourth of July>
