Michael Kaply wrote: > I'm sorry, I misunderstood your use of the term background. I assumed body > background. > > The short answer is that the OS/2 tiling code sucks in this case. > > If you used a bigger image it would help OS/2 a lot. > > We're still investigating how to make this faster. >
Why, then, does the page display more or less instantaneously in Netscape 4.61 (especially ironic since the page tells me "Ihr Web-Browser ist nicht W3C Konform. Wir empfehlen Mozilla oder Netscape 6 oder 7.")? -- Howard
