Howard Harris wrote: > Leo Tick wrote: > >> Wolfi wrote: >> >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> that's strange. When I try to load your page, I get a 100% CPU lock >>> mostly after some of your family members names show up and I have to >>> close the browser. Switching from online to offline and back doesn't >>> help in this case. >>> Any ideas? >>> >>> Regards >>> Wolfi >>> >>> Christoph Vogelbusch wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I just wonder why the windows version is so mch fast with rendering >>>> of fixed background images kombined with transparency then the OS/2 >>>> version. >>>> >>>> Is that because OS/2-PMshell has no transparency support or something? >>>> >>>> You can test it with this page: >>>> http://www.vogelbuschnet.de/VogelbuschNet.html >>>> >>>> (btw the rendering is different in 1.0 and 1.1 I think this is >>>> because of the 100% width + maring bug that is about to be solved. >>>> >>>> Ciao/2 Christoph >>>> >> I reported a jpeg 100% cpu thingo. It's been assigned but so far it >> has not been fixed >> > > Could http://hobbes.nmsu.edu/pub/incoming/jpg-io-procedure-0_1_0.zip > have any effect on this? > >
Mozilla actually uses its own internal image rendering library called libpr0n. The ioproc will only affect the WPS and any programs that use the WPS' ioprocs for rendering. Jeff -- ---------------- Whatza JamochaMUD? http://jamochamud.anecho.mb.ca Or other stuff: http://www.anecho.mb.ca/~jeffnik -----------------------------------------------------------
