Mikus Grinbergs wrote: > > I use Mozilla just as a browser - i.e., to view pages and to > download files (i.e., no mail/news nor other such capabilities). > Since at lest June, I have had NOTHING evil happen to me while > using Mozilla/2 -- it all works. > > I'm competely mystified by various people reporting problems, > or reporting uncertainty. Yes, once in a while there is a > page which apparently was tested *only* with Internet Explorer. > And yes, I create a __new__ profile from scratch every time I > install a new build. But IMHO users ought to be able to take > both of these bothers in stride. > > As I said - for me, MOZILLA/2 WORKS. >
I still use Netscape/2 for mail, newsgroups, and certain internal pages that do not work with Mozilla. Other than that, I have been using Mozilla since December for nearly all of my web surfing. To do this, I had to replace the Megadesk Virtual Desktop utility with the Virtual Desktop feature provided by XWP. I like Megadesk much better than XWP, but Mozilla/2 is definitely worth the switch. I keep both NS/2 and Mo/2 active for days or even a week at a time. I'll shut them down to do a system backup, or to recover memory I choose stability over features. I do not use the TURBO option. I have not installed Java 1.3, and do not have Java turned on for either browser. I have only booted the machine one time in nearly three times, and that was because NS/2's Java Console couldn't be killed. In sum, Mozilla/2 works for me, as well. Bennie Nelson
