On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Mike Jaques wrote: > > "Blake Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 921m03$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:921m03$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> [Editor isn't a removable component since Navigator depends on it for >> textfields, etc.] > If thats the case, tehn I would hope a bug is filed to remove that > dependancy in the future. Why? -- Ian Hickson )\ _. - ._.) fL Netscape, Standards Compliance QA /. `- ' ( `--' +1 650 937 6593 `- , ) - > ) \ irc.mozilla.org:Hixie _________________________ (.' \) (.' -' __________
- Why not a standalone browser? Carcarlo
- Re: Why not a standalone browser? Daniel Veditz
- Re: Why not a standalone browser? Blake Ross
- Re: Why not a standalone browser? Mike Jaques
- Re: Why not a standalone browser? Henri Sivonen
- Re: Why not a standalone browser? Ian Hickson
- Re: Why not a standalone browser? Mike Jaques
- Re: Why not a standalone browser? Ian Hickson
- Re: Why not a standalone browser? Mike Jaques
- Re: Why not a standalone browser? Ian Hickson
- Re: Why not a standalone browser? Mike Jaques
- Re: Why not a standalone browser? Ian Hickson
- Re: Why not a standalone browser? Daniel Veditz
