On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Mike Jaques wrote:
>
> Why aren't these completely seperated into a dll or something and
> called by both program independantly?
They almost certainly are.
Note that the way Mozilla works, the browser, mail window and composer are
merely different XUL files that the backend renderer displays. In theory,
anyway. In practice we might not be so perfect! ;-)
> I know it would be hard to simply "hide" composer during the install, via
> the UI as its part of the chrome, and you'd need two sets of the same chrome
> (unless its there is an ifdef type condition check in XUL) with minor tweaks
> for the composer links in the composer-crippled version, [...]
That would be pointless though, same download size but less
functionality??
--
Ian Hickson )\ _. - ._.) fL
Netscape, Standards Compliance QA /. `- ' ( `--'
+1 650 937 6593 `- , ) - > ) \
irc.mozilla.org:Hixie _________________________ (.' \) (.' -' __________
