Gervase Markham wrote: >We could say that MTBF has to be, say, 200 >hours - but we'd just be pulling numbers out of the air. > Of course. We can't reach "no crashs at all". We must not crash every 2 minutes. Everything in between (including the "acceptable" level, as percieved by the user) is somewhat arbitary. I.e. we must pull a number out of the air. Or go by "feeling", which is even less rational. My "MTBF 250-500 hours" comes from 'Mozilla should crash at most once a month on the average'.
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Alan S. Jones
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Petr Krenzelok
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Christopher Blizzard
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Alan S. Jones
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Ben Bucksch
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 H�kan Waara
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Ben Bucksch
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Syd Logan
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 illion
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Chris Seawood
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 pete collins
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 David Baron
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Dan Mosedale
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Chris Seawood
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Greg Miller
