Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0

[Gervase Markham]

> "almost no crashs" I would personally define as MTBF (mean time before
> failure) of 250-500 hours.

Talkback does produce hard MTBF figures, I think. Do we want to set an
MTBF hard target for 1.0?
 
> >Why? Recently, we have been going through a stable period, and people are
> >generally pleased with the levels of stability and performance Mozilla has
> >reached.
> >
> Which "people"? People involved in the development of Mozilla?

General newsgroup comment. I refer to my disclaimer about possible
falsehoods :-)
 
> >My point is that we should be happy with current levels
> >
> I disagree.

Then you need to define where we need to be by 1.0.
 
>     * I think that 100% GNKSA-compliance (all MUSTs fulfilled) is what
>       we should provide for 1.0.

Yes, I agree.

Gerv