in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Miller at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01-06-25 10.03:
>
> However, Gerv wasn't saying that performance doesn't matter. He meant
> that saying "<feature A> has to operate in <n> milliseconds on a <x> MHz
> Pentium III" wasn't a good idea. At least, that was how I interpreted it.
Yes, but what i mean is that if no actual goal is set, pretty much nothing
is going t happen. I would like to know what for example start-up time (no
-turbo) that Mozilla has set for a 1.0 goal.
I defenately think they need such a goal. Otherwise they will have a hard
time fighting bloat&sluggishness. Which i personaly think are to only
problems left. Browser wise mozilla is excellent, the only flaw is
performance.
Why don�t someone post a poll over at mozilla zine, asking on what to
focus on till 1.0 ?
