Andreas Franke wrote:
> Sure, a "no new features" strategy may make sense,
> but then mozilla 1.0 needs to happen very soon indeed.
That's exactly what I'd like to see happen.
> I just wanted to point out that maybe from a third party's
> point of view, non-existing APIs can be worse than
> existing ones that aren't completely stable yet.
Not to me. I experimented with a Mozilla-based client project a while
back, but everything kept changing under my feet. I'm waiting for the
major interfaces to be declared *permanently frozen* before I resume any
work on it. New interfaces added later don't break my code. Changes to
existing interfaces do.
--
http://www.classic-games.com/ http://www.indie-games.com/
I've often thought intelligence agencies should recruit idiots, as
idiots seem able to infiltrate any group in large numbers.
