On Sun, 01 Jul 2001 14:24:35 -0700 esteemed tradervik did hold forth thusly: > "1.0 will be competitive with or surpass IE in terms of standards > support and the user > experience." (perhaps too ambitious) Whether or not this is the standard for 1.0 is the key issue here. If it is not to be the standard for a 1.0 release then why is it not? To put it another way: Why does the world need a browser that is less than this?
- Mozilla 1.0 definition requires "vision statement&quo... tradervik
- Re: Mozilla 1.0 definition requires "vision stat... Greg Miller
- Re: Mozilla 1.0 definition requires "vision stat... Gervase Markham
- Re: Mozilla 1.0 definition requires "vision stat... Randall Parker
- Re: Mozilla 1.0 definition requires "vision ... Greg Miller
- Re: Mozilla 1.0 definition requires "vision stat... Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mozilla 1.0 definition requires "vision ... Randall Parker
