Randall Parker wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2001 14:24:35 -0700 esteemed tradervik did hold forth thusly:
>
>>"1.0 will be competitive with or surpass IE in terms of standards
>>support and the user
>>experience." (perhaps too ambitious)
>>
>
> Whether or not this is the standard for 1.0 is the key issue here. If it is
> not to be the standard for a 1.0 release then why is it not?
Seems like a pretty good standard to me. Hixie would disagree with the
first part (he aims for a higher level of standards compliance), but
otherwise there's a lot of agreement here. It just doesn't settle any of
the issues in the main 1.0 thread.
> To put it another way: Why does the world need a browser that is less than
> this?
Who cares what the world needs? This is about what the Mozilla project
needs to do.
--
http://www.classic-games.com/ http://www.indie-games.com/
I've often thought intelligence agencies should recruit idiots, as
idiots seem able to infiltrate any group in large numbers.
