Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
> In netscape.public.mozilla.seamonkey the people heard Asa Dotzler say
> these wise words:
>
>
>>>IMHO, 1.0 quality = all implemented features working to an acceptably
>>>high standard, and released as a finished product.
>>>
>>
>>This kind of comment does nothing to help the discussion. This thread
>>is about defining the "acceptably high standard". Saying 1.0 needs to
>>meet the standard we've defined for 1.0 is a little silly, no?
>>
>
> The acceptable standard is - "free of known bugs"!
Really? How manby projects even half the size of this can you name that
are free of known bugs? We have over 15,279 open Bugzilla bug reports on
the Browser, MailNews, NSS, PSM and NSPR components. You're saying we
shouldn't tag the source tree with a 1.0 label until all of those are
fixed?!?
--Asa
