.................................
To leave Commie, hyper to
http://commie.oy.com/commie_leaving.html
.................................
hm... but here actually musicans doing music live with the computer,
and there is a sociability between the musican and the audiance as well
as between two, three or more people doing music with the computer as
a instrument.
i think all this text is about the same talking, that these old musicans
whine about all time, that computer based music is bad, is unhuman, no sociability and
this. but again you have musicans
who say their live performance is a war ( or a battle ) between the involved
musicans and sometimes war agains the audience.
and then there is a magical fluence between me and the computer, between
me and the media the material i use to produce sound, and in the back of
my mind the audiance who will one day hear the music.
> The great guitarist Ry Cooder once put it this way: "Music
> gives you radar sensitivity to people because you closely
> associate with others as you play your music." Programmers
> never develop this sociability, this magical fluency in a
> nonverbal language - they don't need it; they've never been
> challenged by the requirements of real time music making.
when we do these sessions at the institut of telenautik we have there
sequencers, computers, samples, mediaplayers ( tapes, md, cd, radiowaves )
and "real instruments" instruments to, and there is some acting between
us.
than is to say that sequenced computer music mostly is performend later
from the media called vinyl by djs, and there is much interacting with
the audience.
anyway, maybe there is no need of this magical fluence or this magical
fluence is just a illusion like all these magical stuff !?!
istari
