Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Decoder quality comparison [quite detailed - so rry if repeat]

[Greg Maxwell]

On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Mark Taylor wrote:

[snip]
> There was also a bug in the ISO encoder which could easily be in the
> decoder: It was reversing the order of the individual quadruples in
> the count1 region. This bug only effects the highest frequencies, and
> is particularly insidious because it produces small flaws which could
> be attribted to compression artifacts.
[snip]

Could something like this be one of the reasons so many people were (and
still are) singing the prases of the almighty blade encoder? :)

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )