Re: [MP3 ENCODER] misc questions

[Chris Matrakidis]

> What about using the FFTW package instead of our fft. Perhaps it can be
> faster? Perhaps Chris got an indication about this?

The fft we have is quite fast and simple. There are faster ones (FFTW is one of
the fastest as far as I know), but I the one I used was one of the fastest and
simplest I could find and the only one that produced a binary identical mp3
file with the original fft.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list