I'm not sure that -X always contributes to reduce the artifacts. They may be
caused by something else, but the question is what?
Gabriel Bouvigne - France
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 12138873
MP3' Tech: www.mp3tech.org
----- Message d'origine -----
De : Macik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À : LAME Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoyé : mercredi 30 juin 1999 00:21
Objet : Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: 5 dB reduction
>
>
> On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Gabriel Bouvigne wrote:
>
> > lame -b 32 -V 0 -m s track7.wav track7j.mp3 :150kbps
> > lame -b 32 -V 0 -m s -X track7.wav track7j.mp3 : 213kbps
> >
> > It's perhaps a too high increase.
> >
> >
>
> I don't think it is too high. Cut from "Main Theme" wave (discussed 3
> weeks ago) is hard piece to encode even with -X. I've encoded it with
> "lame -v -V 0 -m s -X -Y -Z -d -t -k cut.wav" and there _are_ strange
> artifacts when I use HQ headphones. I've tested it with my 2 friends too
> and they both could tell me, which wav was original and which was mp3.
> Fraunhofer's mp3enc 3.1 does 100% job at 224kbps. (avg bitrate using Lame
> 3.13 was 225.6 kbps.)
>
> Bye, macik
>
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
>
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
