Olaf Thorm�hlen wrote:
> btw: it seems like in pgcc 2.95.1 -ffast-math is broken. using it when
> compiling the standard lame 2.25 gives me a (nearly) constant result of 32
> kbit/s with options -V0 -d -h. the result is of course awful.
>
> should we write this into the makefile?
Well, pgcc should come with a label "don't use this if you do not intend
to debug it". pgcc has been producing wrong code since years, not to
mention that pgcc-generated code more often than not produced actually
WORSE code (performance-wise, of course), than then current gcc/egcs.
So pgcc should be marked eventually but not lame neccessarily, because
many software packages are affected.
Frank
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
