FhG faster than Xing? It seems strange.
I'll try to hear it in order to see if it's a low quality encoder or a good
one.
Could someone with an unix box and gtk have a look at it on castanets with
the frame analyser in order to see if they use some short and long blocks or
only long ones like Xing.
Btw, according to the gogo page, Lame can be twice as fast as it is using
asm.
Regards,
Gabriel Bouvigne - France
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 12138873
MP3' Tech: www.mp3tech.org
----- Message d'origine -----
De : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
� : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoy� : mardi 28 septembre 1999 15:46
Objet : RE: [MP3 ENCODER] New (FAST!) FhG MP3 encoder with VBR support
> > "Fast" is suspiciously fast - Xing fast you might say.
> Faster than xing on my box.
> Encoding my standard 150 second file takes less than 60 seconds with nero
(fast
> mode).
> Xing(linux) takes abou 110 seconds
> (p166 RH6.0)
> later
> mike
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
>
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
