On 21-Oct-99 Gabriel Bouvigne wrote: > Do you think that LAME can still be called an ISO encoder? The encoder isn't fully specified by the standard. Only the decoder is. (There are decoder test input files which have to produced a specified output for the decoder to be considered fully compliant iirc) Anything which makes a bitstream capable of being decoded is an encoder. They just vary in how good they are :) later mike -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] Is Lame still an ISO encoder Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Is Lame still an ISO encoder mikecheng
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Is Lame still an ISO encoder Gabriel Bouvigne
