|
I have read that the fhg encoder is the best encoder for bitrates around
124kbits/sec (BladeEnc homepage, Use! page, cdr software review http://cdrsoft.cjb.net/), while BladeEnc and
Lame are doing a better job at higher bitrates . Now in Lame's homepage the
author says that fhg is a better encoder than Lame.
Isn't that strange? Is he perhaps referring only to lower
bitrates?
With regards,
Dimitris
P.S. Please pardon my English!
----- Original Message -----
|
