Hi

> The other big one is the FFT code; always shows up near the top of profiles.
> But there are quite a few high performance FFT implementations around (e.g.
> FFTW) that we haven't tried yet.
> 
> -- Mat.

I replaced the FFT module with the one from libfftw (librfftw to be exact) and noticed 
reasonable overall performance improvement on a Compaq SP700 (dual Xeon @ 450MHz) and 
a Compaq DS20 (dual 21264/EV6 @ 500MHz) running Linux kernel v2.2.13. However, I also 
notice the output imaginary as well the energy terms from the original FFT function do 
*NOT* match that of FFTW function. This conclusion was drawn after running a test 
program using both FFT routines with a known input vector (1024 term Gaussian signal). 
I also used the MATLAB result as reference. Did anyone notice this discrepancy? I'd be 
happy to post my test program if there is interest to reproduce the aforementioned 
finding.

- King Chow

----------------------------------------------------------------
Get your free email from AltaVista at http://altavista.iname.com
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to