> > >>> XRPOW_FTOI(x, rx); > >>should be > >>> XRPOW_FTOI(x-.5, rx); > >>? > No, it is right. > But Acy missed to fix adj43asm initialization. > > details are in my old mail on this ML. ok, fixed. But does the MSVC asm code want the new adj43asm[], or the old adj43asm[]? Mark -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] CVS update access and changes to make ... Mathew Hendry
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] CVS update access and changes to ... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] CVS update access and changes... Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] CVS update access and cha... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] CVS update access and... Acy Stapp
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] CVS update access and... Mathew Hendry
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] CVS update access and chan... Holger Dors
- RE: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] CVS update access and chan... Mathew Hendry
- Re[4]: [MP3 ENCODER] CVS update access and chan... Holger Dors
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] CVS update access and cha... Mark Taylor
