>Hi,
>
>That's right. therefore in FAAC you will see this:
>if ((nb[0][b] <= 1.58*nb[1][b])||(nb[1][b] <= 1.58*nb[0][b]))
>and in LAME:
>if ((ratio[0][b] >= 1.58*ratio[1][b])||(ratio[1][b] >= 1.58*ratio[0][b]))
>
>Or the other way around, I don't have access to my source code where I am
now.
>Also I think that LAME is doing these calculations with the final ratios,
>while I in FAAC use the nb values (can't remember how they were called in
>LAME, sorry).
>The beta source code is available on the developers page, I hope you can find
>them, it will make this a lot clearer.
>
>Bye, Menno
Sorry, that was not entirely the reason. Basically the values are used in a
whole different way, than in LAME. Just take a look at psy_step11andahalf().
Menno
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
