Argh, you've got me.
Sorry but with an nine to five job I hardly have the time to
write some annoying mail to hard working programmers :-)
Mark Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 18.01.2000 07:52:35
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Thomas Marschall/MUC/Santix)
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Usability
>
> I would suggest the following:
>
> Automated settings on flags like -V6 (filters etc.) are OK as it speeds up
> handling for users who don't read lots of dokumentation. Additional flags -h
-l
> add "high quality" with loss of speed or "high speed" with loss of quality.
> This is implemented as I think from reading this list.
>
> Separate CMDline parameters for all other settings, modifying only the
parameter
> named. This is for the ones who read dokumentation.
>
> MOST IMPORTANT: -p (or appropriate for parameter) should give a list
containing
> _ALL_ parameters affecting compression with their values (name of the flag to
> modify them and range would be nice too) for the actual compression (maybe in
a
> table). I really like to know if any filter is applied to my compression or
not.
> Even if I don't understand _all_ those parameters ... I don't like black
boxes.
>
> Keep coding, Thomas.
>
so are you volunteering to do all this work? :-)
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
