On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 06:37:16PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 27-Jan-2000 Mark Taylor wrote:
> > Mike also claimed he was interested in parallel encoding, but
> > I assume the real application is seamless splices of 30s mp3s created
> > by the FhG demo encoder :-)
> Dammit you saw through my plan :). But the extension to parallel coding was a
> legitimate hack.
ditto 8)
> The difficulty in getting reservoirs aligned etc just was a pain in the butt.
> I've switched to using mp2 (toolame) to do my editing/splicing. (working on a
> simple way of editing 8hour mp2 files at the moment)
i haven't searched the archives yet, so don't flame me for this please,
but..
i'm interested in encoding some .wavs i have at the highest quality
possible. disk space isn't much of a concern here other than that a
"significant reduction" from the original PCM size would be nice. at the
moment i'm using lame -v 0 (which typically generates mp3s at ~300kb), but
some cookie on the linux-audio-dev mailing list mentioned that for
high-quality encoding, mpeg-2 is much better.
i'm not sure if he meant mpeg-2 or mpeg-1 layer II, but in any case, i'm
unsure where to find a decent mpeg-2 encoder with source code. any
suggestions? any comments on the mpeg-1 layer II (or any other forms of v.
high quality encoding) would also be appreciated.
--
: Andre Pang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Purruna Pty Ltd - ph# 0411.882299 :
: #ozone - http://www.vjolnir.org/ozone/ :
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
