> S> I just committed a NOPOW define to CVS which when enabled will
> S> replace certain pow() combinations with optimized variants ..
> S> this gives an average of 20% speedincrease on my machines (68k
> S> & PPC), might be more or less on yours, try it out... ;)
>Why don't you use table :)
>all pow(2.0, global_gain*0.25) and pow(2.0, -global_gain*0.1875) could
>be rewrite table lookup.
Yes, that's probably alot more sensible... ;)
- CISC
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
