but then you're in conflict with VBR.
_J
In the new year, Gabriel Bouvigne wrote:
> > As the voice of reason (as a user), why highq instead of quality?
> >
> > Seeing that 9 (low quality) contradicts the variable.
>
> I would suggest something before the 3.62 is out on the website:
> Using 0 as the lowest quality and 9 as the highest. This would allow some
> future extensions. If one day all the 10 levels are used, and that we have a
> new super-high-quality-fantastic-thing to add, using the current order, we'd
> have to add it on the 0th level, with the thing previously controlled by 0.
> Instead of this, using 9 as the highest setting, we could add a new level
> (ie 10 or more), remaining totally backward compatible with the options
> controlled by the switch.
>
> Just a personnal opinion...
>
>
> Gabriel Bouvigne - France
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> icq: 12138873
>
> MP3' Tech: www.mp3tech.org
> (temporary down, alternative url is http://mp3tech.tsx.org )
>
>
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
>
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
