> it prints a warning that one of its packets was missing. In addition to > the packet transmitted is a packet number. When they are out of sequence > or missing, the utility whines about it. I am currently writing a receiver than substitutes the packet with the closest sequence number instead. This is not perfect, but if the RTP packets each contain one MPEG frame, this should actually sound decent even with 10% packet loss or something like that. Felix -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME CRASH... Don Melton
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME CRASH... Felix von Leitner
- Re: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME C... Robert Hegemann
- Re: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME C... Felix von Leitner
- Re: Re: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LA... Robert Hegemann
- Re: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME C... Jeremy Hall
- Re: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME C... Felix von Leitner
- Re: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME C... Jeremy Hall
- Re: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME C... Felix von Leitner
- Re: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME C... Jeremy Hall
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME CRASH... Felix von Leitner
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME CRASHES / LAME... Cavallo de Cavallis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME CRASHES /... Felix von Leitner
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME CRASH... Cavallo de Cavallis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME CRASH... Felix von Leitner
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME CRASH... Cavallo de Cavallis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME CRASH... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME CRASH... Cavallo de Cavallis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] nopow & fft things Mark Taylor
