> LAME will resample the 22.05khz files to 44.1khz for you with
> --resample 44.1, but you are better off doing that with
> something like 'sox' first. LAME's resample code is
> adequate for downsampling, but probably not for upsampling.
I've been wondering about this for a long time. I mean, since these 22.05kHz
have already been encoded to MP3 once, and LAME decodes, upsamples or downsamples
it, then encodes it to MP3 AGAIN, how much does the quality suffer from re-encoding
the file?
Ivo
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
