Taupter wrote: > > The term Kbps to represent data transfer speed in bits is absolutely > wrong, as bit is "bit", and Kbps is K (1000 or 1024) * byte * p (?) * s > (second). The right way could be Kbit/s. The term Kbps is widely used, > but it not a "canonical" representation. > Are you _sure_ that the term kbps used for transfer rate is wrong? I don't think so. If you take them as k*b*p(?)*s then why not mph [miles per hour] is m*p(?)*s. You can take the "p" as 1/x. Here x is s, so - kbps and kbit/s means the same. That's the idea that I get. Any comments? - Zia -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] definition of "kbps" Mathew Hendry
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] definition of "kbps" David Balazic
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] definition of "kbps" Taupter
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] definition of "kbps"... Mathew Hendry
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] definition of "kbps&... Taupter
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] definition of "k... David Balazic
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] definition of "kbps"... Zia Mazhar
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] definition of "kbps&... David Balazic
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] definition of "k... Christian Schepke
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] definition of "kbps&... Christian Schepke
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] definition of "kbps" Scott Manley
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] definition of "kbps" Mathew Hendry
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] definition of "kbps" Meister Roger
