Ross Levis wrote: > I've inadvertantly encoded 5 or 6 albums with this switch. Is there > likely to be > any quality problems that you know about. > > Ross. I do not think that this has much effect on the quality, however, if you want to use the "-X" switch (also undocumented, although it should be), -q 1 is recommended for not stopping the quantization loop when over=0 (and it may be actually the same thing that sometimes causes the endless loops). -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] Re: new scalefac_scale algorithm Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: new scalefac_scale algorithm ... Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: new scalefac_scale algori... Leonardo Stern
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: new scalefac_scale... Roel VdB
- [MP3 ENCODER] I'd like "-Z" to be... Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] I'd like "-Z&quo... Takehiro TOMINAGA
- [MP3 ENCODER] Bug with -q1 (win32) Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Bug with -q1 (win32) Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Bug with -q1 (win32) Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Bug with -q1 (wi... Istvan Varga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Bug with -q1... Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Bug with... Istvan Varga
