Hi everyone. Just a quick question... I know that short blocks require more bits to encode than long blocks, but is that the only drawback with using short blocks? I suspected that long blocks would also have better frequency resolution than short blocks (by a factor of 3). Thx Shawn -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Block types vs frequency/time resolution Shawn Riley
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Block types vs frequency/time resoluti... Monty
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Block types vs frequency/time reso... Shawn Riley
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Block types vs frequency/time ... Istvan Varga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Block types vs frequency/t... Shawn Riley
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Block types vs freque... Istvan Varga
