Re: [MP3 ENCODER] small bug in Lame VRB?

[Matthias W�chter]

On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Roel VdB wrote:

> 2) up to 320 kbit/s for a -80->-90dB file? (this is very low volume I
> assume?)

I think that 320 kBit/s is chosen because if the volume of the signal is
very low, the signal is amplified before encoding. But with this, the
noise is amplified, too. So it looks as if there was more information to
encode for LAME than one would think because of the low volume.

Am I right?

Sehr Wus,
- Matthias

-- 
"Schwimm dich nett, Gefischlein!"
            (Drei Herren)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )