Hello Steve, Monday, July 10, 2000, 11:27:36 PM, you wrote: >> As noted in the other post, I, and many with me have very little to >> complain about in with the <=3.85 vbr_rh mode... Cannot find any >> glitches since 3.83, encoded a few hundreth albums and counting... SS> So wait, I'm not quite understanding you. Are you saying I should stick SS> with 3.83, or are you saying I should upgrade to 3.85 for the best VBR mode SS> encoding? A visitor from my site found that -V1 on <=3.82 used too few bits on some clips (kingdom.zip), I verified. Iicrc Mark Taylor fixed this in 3.83, but the 3.83 gave relative big files compared to older versions. Then Takehiro Tominaga brought "-Z" (now -q1), that brought the size back down again, and kept the improvement. (at V1, because some say -q1 is too agressive at lower bitrates) I use 3.85 beta now. -- Best regards, Roel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Mark Taylor
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Steve Schow
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Don Melton
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code David
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Don Melton
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Ivo
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Roel VdB
- RE: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Steve Schow
- [MP3 ENCODER] Lame development matures ... Roel VdB
- [MP3 ENCODER] Lame development matures ... Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame development matures ... Monty
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame development matures ... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame development matures ... Twinkles
- [MP3 ENCODER] The "-b128" bug in 386 again,... Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] The "-b128" bug in 386 ag... Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] The "-b128" bug in 386 ag... David
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] The "-b128" bug in 386 ag... Robert Hegemann
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] The "-b128" bug in 386... Roel VdB
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] The "-b128" bug in 386... Roel VdB
