> > I looked up in my notes and found that when I was first looking into
> > this, I measured the layer II (ISO code, encode, decode) delay: it was
> > about 480 (plus or minus a few samples). Layer II uses *only* the
> > polyphase filterbank (same one used in layer III) so this further
> > sugested the filterbank delay is 480 (+/- 1).
511 - 32 = 479, so I would go for the -1.
> >
> > So I think a value of 481 agrees with both observations and
Can you try to find out if 479 agrees? It sounds more reasonable :-)
> > my analysis. But if you have evidence that it really 511, it
> > would be important to resolve this.
> >
> >
> > Mark
Dag dag,
Segher
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
