Hi.
On Die, 25 Jul 2000, Roel VdB wrote:
>best use "lame --decode", as it's the only correct decoder around
>(check that decoding site) (but it makes no difference here)
What is wrong with mpg123 -w ? Or was "only" meant in a way that encompasses
only the windows-world?
I understand that lame --decode basically uses mpglib/mpg123 for decoding,
but I'd like to know if lame's version differs from the original mpg123 (i.e.
bugfixes and the like).
Are there differences in the quality of the decoders? I read about the bugs
on the page mentioned above, but apart from that?
cu arne
--
Arne Zellentin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
